Delhi High Court serves notice on govt, GST Council in real estate...

Delhi High Court serves notice on govt, GST Council in real estate case


The has issued a notice to the Union government, national anti-profiteering authority, and the on a petition over quas­hing the proceedings laun­ched against a player on an anti-profiteering complaint.

The directorate general of anti-profiteering (DGAP) had earlier served a notice on a company over a complaint by a home buyer that the builder had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit to him for a unit bought by it in a residential complex, said Abhishek Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co.

Through the notice, DGAP had sought voluminous details from the builder relating to tax returns filed for the relevant period, tax payments, input tax credit availed and contracts that builder had entered into with the flat buyers.

The petitioner moved the court against the DGAP probe, saying the complainant had booked the unit in a residential project in the 2018-19 financial year after the introduction of goods and services tax (GST) and hence there was no change in the GST rate or availment of input tax credit during such period which would necessitate investigation.

As such, the prima facie evidence as required under the anti-profiteering provisions of the CGST Act does not exist, according to the petitioner.

The case is not pertinent to one home builder, but an order would set a precedence for all those home builders who sold their flats after GST came into effect, said Rastogi. He said anti-profiteering provisi­ons could apply when there is change in either output tax rate or increased input tax credit.

“The flats sold after RERA registration in the GST regime would not be subject to profiteering at all especially when the builder has submitted not to opt for a lower regime,” Rastogi said.

After the decision, the governments have given players to opt for one of the two regimes — 5 per cent GST without input tax credit or 12 per cent GST with input tax credit. This option was given till March 31, 2019 after which the lower tax regime came into operation.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Source link